CRI — Carter's, Inc. · 2026-09-10 · Verdict: WATCH · Conviction 3
Price $32.28 (screen row, 2026-09-09 close; no live price used) · Mkt cap $1.185B · EV $1.136B · EV/normalised after-tax profit 9.1x · Underlying FCF yield ~7% · Net funded cash $79M · ADV $42M Sources read: 10-K filed 2026-02-27 (FY2025 ended 2026-01-03; Items 1, 1A, 7), 10-Q filed 2026-07-31 (Q2 ended 2026-07-04), DEF 14A 2026-04-01, 8-Ks 2026-05-01, 2026-05-06, 2026-07-31, 2026-08-20, Form 4s (12m), Q2 FY2026 earnings call transcript.
Desk stats - Revenue trend. FY2025 net sales $2,898.4M, +1.9%, but the year had 53 weeks and the extra week added about $37M, so like-for-like growth was roughly +0.6% (10-K 2026, Item 7). Q2 FY2026 sales $615.5M, +5.2%: U.S. Wholesale +11.7% (partly fall product pulled forward out of Q3), U.S. Retail +1.7% on +5.1% comps, International +2.7%; AUR up mid-single digits, units low single digits (10-Q Q2 2026; Q2 call, CFO). - Normalised after-tax operating profit. GAAP FY2025 operating income $143.9M, plus operating model improvement (consulting) costs $14.2M and leadership transition costs $8.1M (10-K 2026, Item 7 non-GAAP table). I do not add back the $9.8M organizational restructuring: it recurred from $1.8M in FY2024 and FY2026 guidance still carries about $8M of leadership-transition and IP-litigation adjustments (Q2 release, Business Outlook), so it is a running cost of the 150-store closure programme. Desk normalised EBIT $166.2M versus the company's own $176.0M adjusted; taxed at 25%, $124.7M normalised after-tax against GAAP $107.9M. No impairment in FY2025; the $30.0M OshKosh tradename write-down was FY2024. - EV / normalised after-tax profit. $1,185.0M equity + $575.0M senior notes principal (7.375%, due Feb 2031, carried at $567.8M net of issuance costs) − $623.6M cash, deducting from the reported $653.6M the roughly $30M of tax on the tariff refund payable in September (Q2 call, CFO). $1,136M / $124.7M = 9.1x; 8.6x on the company's adjusted figure; 8.0-8.2x on FY2026 guided adjusted EBIT of $180-185M at the guided 23% tax. - Leverage. Net funded debt negative: $575.0M notes less $653.6M cash = $79M net cash, $49M after the September tax. Normalised EBITDA about $218M ($166.2M + $51.5M D&A), so funded leverage is nil. The screen stops there; the balance sheet also carries $616.9M of operating lease liabilities ($132.7M current, $484.2M long-term) against a 1,068-store fleet, though that rent already sits inside operating income. - Is the growth sustainable? Organic and cash-backed but slow. Five straight quarters of U.S. Retail comp growth (+8% in H1); wholesale bookings up for fall, up more for winter, "notably above a year ago" for early spring 2027 (Q2 call, CFO). Management narrowed FY2026 sales growth from low-to-mid single digit to 2-3% on lighter H2 wholesale and a more value-conscious consumer, while holding adjusted operating income growth at low-to-mid single digits. - What the screen got wrong. (1) The 33x latest-quarter EBIT growth is pure artefact: Q2 GAAP operating income of $139.8M includes $128M of IEEPA tariff refund booked as a reduction of cost of goods sold; adjusted operating income was $18.1M (10-Q Q2 2026). The screen's artifact_flag is false because it only tests for impairments. (2) The $653.6M cash behind "net cash $86M" is inflated by that refund and owes about $30M of tax in September. (3) The 1.9% revenue growth is a 53-week number.
1. What the business does
Apparel for children newborn to 14 under Carter's, OshKosh B'gosh, Skip Hop, Little Planet and the new Otter Avenue, plus three retailer-exclusive brands (Child of Mine at Walmart, Just One You at Target, Simple Joys on Amazon). Three segments: U.S. Retail (804 U.S. stores plus eCommerce), U.S. Wholesale (about 19,500 doors, roughly 35% of sales), International (192 stores in Canada, 72 in Mexico, about 45 licensees in over 90 countries). The Carter's brands hold about 9% of the $29 billion U.S. zero-to-ten market and about 21% of the zero-to-two baby market (10-K 2026, Item 1). Substantially all product is sourced from Asia, which is why tariffs dominate the recent P&L.
2. Why it is mispriced — the edge case
A temporary problem plus a leadership vacuum, with reported numbers unreadable in both directions. FY2025 GAAP operating income fell 43.5% to $143.9M on roughly $60M of incremental tariff cost (10-K 2026, Item 7), so the trailing screen multiple sits on a trough; Q2 FY2026 swung the other way, GAAP operating margin printing 22.7% when the real figure was 2.9%. Screening on GAAP gets a wrong answer twice. The seller is a generalist who has watched three CEOs in eighteen months: Michael Casey retired in Q1 2025, Douglas Palladini departed after about a year effective 2026-04-28, Richard Westenberger served as interim twice, and Sharon Price John started 2026-06-15 (8-K 2026-05-01, Item 5.02). The dividend was cut from $0.80 to $0.25 a quarter in 2025 and buybacks stopped: none in FY2025 or H1 2026 despite $599.0M of remaining authorization. Income and buyback funds had reasons to leave. Whether they are wrong is not yet established, which is the honest limit of this edge case.
3. Unit economics and growth
FY2025 gross margin fell 260bps to 45.4% and the SG&A rate rose 230bps to 41.0%, giving 5.0% GAAP and 6.1% adjusted operating margin (10-K 2026, Item 7). Segment profit shows where the money is: U.S. Wholesale $160.5M at 16.0% margin, U.S. Retail $72.4M at 4.9%, International $35.0M at 8.1%, total $267.8M against $143.9M consolidated. That wholesale engine is concentrated: two customers were 11.0% and 10.3% of consolidated sales, the top five about 30% (10-K 2026, Item 1A). FY2026 is showing operating leverage for the first time in three years. Q2 adjusted SG&A of $270M fell 1% on higher sales, nearly 300bps of rate leverage from store closures and restructuring savings, and adjusted operating income of $18.1M beat the $11-13M guided on 2026-05-06 (8-K 2026-05-06; Q2 call). eCommerce comped double digits for a fourth straight quarter at a better-than-average operating margin (Q2 call, CFO). Cash conversion is mediocre: FY2025 CFO $122.3M less $53.7M capex gave $68.6M of FCF, depressed by about $50M of tariffs capitalised into inventory. Stripping the refund out of guided FY2026 CFO of $230-240M leaves roughly $130-140M, less $50M capex, so underlying FCF is about $80-90M, a 7% yield.
4. Balance sheet and capital allocation
One maturity: $575.0M of 7.375% notes due February 2031, refinanced in November 2025 out of $500M of 5.625% 2027 notes, no ABL borrowings and $743.7M available at year end (10-K 2026, Item 7). That refinancing costs about $0.30 of FY2026 EPS (Q2 call, CFO). Share count drifts up, not down: 36.71M versus 36.43M a year earlier, no buyback since FY2024's 736,423 shares at an average $68.61. Alignment is weak: all directors and executive officers hold 3.2%, much of it unvested (DEF 14A 2026-04-01); Form 4s show zero open-market purchases and zero open-market sales in twelve months, only grants and tax withholding, the largest at $39.96 (Form 4, 2026-08-11). BlackRock holds 14.3%, RWWM, Inc. 7.0%. The new CEO gets $1.3M base, 175% target bonus and at least $6.5M of annual equity from FY2027 (8-K 2026-05-01), so her alignment is real but forward-dated.
5. Management: said vs did
The May guide of $11-13M Q2 adjusted operating income came in at $18.1M, while full-year sales guidance was cut and operating income guidance held: a genuine mix, disclosed plainly. The CFO volunteered that Q2 gross margin was "probably 80-or-so basis points worse than our forecast" and that Q2 wholesale included a Q3 pull-forward. On the cash he refused the buyback question: "at the moment, running with a bit more liquidity I think makes a lot of sense," because "senior administration officials multiple times have said that their intention is to return the tariff rates to that IEEPA level, if not higher" (Q2 call). The new CEO gave no plan: "just five weeks in, haven't sat with the board yet." Fair, and also why this is not yet an idea.
6. Valuation
Base (50%): FY2027 sales about $3.0B, adjusted operating margin recovering to about 6.5% as tariffs anniversary and productivity savings land, $35M net interest, 23% tax, 36M shares; adjusted EPS about $3.60 at 11x = $40. Bear (30%): tariffs restored to IEEPA levels as signalled, gross margin resumes falling, comps flatten as they did in July; EPS about $2.40 at 8x = $19. Bull (20%): Section 301 rates hold at 10-12.5%, the unspent part of the roughly $125M of tariff relief the CFO hinted at flows through, bookings convert, and the $599M authorization is used; EPS about $4.25 at 13x = $55. Probability-weighted $36.70, about 14% above $32.28. Reverse DCF: at $32.28 the enterprise is capitalised at about 13.7x underlying FCF of roughly $83M, which at a 9% cost of capital implies about 1.6% perpetual growth, so the price assumes Carter's never earns much more than its tariff-suppressed 2026 rate but offers little discount to that assumption either.
7. Catalysts
Q3 FY2026 results in late October, guided to about $750M of sales and about $50M of adjusted operating income versus $39M last year, in a quarter where September alone is "one of our largest volume months of the year" (Q2 call). The Section 301 overcapacity investigation, which either restores higher rates or leaves the current 10-12.5% intact and hands back upside the CFO declined to quantify. The new CEO's first strategy presentation, likely with FY2027 guidance in February 2027, the earliest realistic point for a buyback restart.
8. Risks and pre-registered kill criteria
Risks: two wholesale customers at 11.0% and 10.3% of sales; a single Braselton, Georgia distribution facility handling most U.S. store and eCommerce volume; declining U.S. birth rates (10-K 2026, Item 1A); and elevated impairment risk the company itself flags for remaining goodwill and tradenames (10-Q Q2 2026). Kill criteria: 1. U.S. Retail comparable sales negative in any two consecutive quarters, ending the five-quarter streak. 2. Q3 FY2026 adjusted operating income below $45M against the roughly $50M guide, or FY2026 adjusted operating income guided below FY2025's $176M. 3. Tariffs restored to IEEPA levels and management quantifies gross incremental FY2027 tariff cost above $150M with no matching pricing plan. 4. A new goodwill or tradename impairment, or a cut to the $0.25 quarterly dividend.
9. Verdict
WATCH, conviction 3. Carter's is the number-one brand in U.S. baby apparel at about 9x normalised after-tax operating profit and roughly 10x forward adjusted EPS with no funded net debt, and the screen's headline numbers are wrong twice over: FY2025 GAAP profit is a tariff trough and Q2 FY2026 GAAP profit is inflated by a one-time $128M customs refund carrying $30M of tax. Underneath the noise the business is turning, with five straight quarters of retail comp growth, nearly 300bps of SG&A leverage in Q2, and wholesale bookings up through spring 2027. What is missing is not a story but a margin of safety and a decision-maker: a 6% operating margin business with two customers at 11% and 10% of sales, insiders owning 3.2% with zero open-market buying, $600M of buyback authorization deliberately parked because the CFO expects tariffs to come back, and a CEO five weeks into the job who has explicitly declined to describe her plan. At $32.28 the probability-weighted value is about $37, a 14% spread that does not pay for that uncertainty. Revisit at the late-October Q3 print and the CEO's first strategy update; a move toward the mid-$20s on a tariff scare with comps still positive would make this an idea rather than a watch.
Research for discussion, not investment advice. Positions and sizing are the reader's decision.